Home » Red Notice Removal » Request for Access to INTERPOL Files
People often learn that a Red Notice may exist only indirectly: a visa refused without explanation, a bank account closed, a border officer who takes a passport away for twenty minutes. None of these tells you what is actually on file, which country supplied it, or what offence is alleged.
An application for correction or deletion built on assumptions is weak, and a poorly founded application consumes months that cannot be recovered. Establishing the facts first is not a delay, it is what makes the later application worth filing.
The CCF sets out formal requirements, and incomplete applications are not so much refused as postponed: the Commission writes back, and months pass. An application should include:
The CCF confirms whether data concerning the applicant is recorded in Interpol’s files. Where the source country consents to disclosure, the Commission also discloses the substance of the notice or diffusion: the offence alleged, the requesting country, and the status of the underlying warrant.
Where consent is withheld, the answer is narrower. Even then it establishes whether a file exists, which is the single fact everything else depends on.
The reply is the foundation for everything that follows. It determines whether the right application is one for correction or one for deletion, it identifies the jurisdiction whose records need to be obtained, and it frequently provides the first hard evidence available to Thai counsel resisting a provisional arrest.
The CCF may consult the source country when deciding whether the content can be disclosed. This is a normal part of the procedure and is one reason the application should be prepared carefully rather than filed casually.
IN THIS SECTION
RELATED LEGAL UPDATES
Herrera & Partners
142 Two Pacific Place, 17th Floor, Unit 1705
Sukhumvit Road, Klongtoey
Bangkok 10110, Thailand